Modifiers of an en phrase valid?

[janMato]

[janKipo]

Hmmmm. I can't remember how that plays out in my grammar -- not that that answers the question -- but it looks right to me.

[janUlipe]

pona! taso mi wile sona e ni: sina wile ante la sina sitelen seme?

taso nanpa en poki pi nimi li sama toki pona
anu/en
taso nanpa en pi poki nimi li sama toki pona?

[janUlipe]

kin la toki Tosi en toki Inli li ike sama toki pona.

mi sitelen e ni: »Aber der Numerus und die Stellung des Wortes gleichen Tokipona.» la mi sona e ala.

taso mi ken sitelen e ni:
»Aber der Numerus und die Wortstellung gleichen Tokipona.«
anu
»Aber der Numerus des Wortes und seine Stellung gleichen Tokipona.«

[janKipo]

German doesn't apply, alas, even if the first is grammatical but unclear. Mato's tp is, I think grammatical, but admittedly unclear. But most cases of modifiers with any break from the standard format are unclear: three words after 'pi' for example.

sitelen e seme
'pi' needs at least two content words after it, so 'pi nimi' won't do, unless you are suggesting a change to deal with this situation, as your second form suggests ('pi' has to come after a noun phrase).

[janKalepa]

[janSilipu]

I think it was "But the number and classes of words are the same as tp"

[janKalepa]