Page 4 of 4

Re: nd-notation. How to count anything in tp?

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:08 pm
by janpona120
To me the main question about math is whether we need to mark the words for mathematical use.
We have a simple and clear templet "nanpa X" to explain all math by tp. It may cover any need in mathematics among tp-community.
For example:
-- nanpa ko -- a mass (a weight), because a full weight is contained of all minimanl portions ("ko").
-- nanpa kule -- a temperature, because there is a direct relation between temperature and color
-- nanpa walo -- a purity of material, and so on

I am sure, we should fill the templet "nanpa X" (a set of 120 meanings), and we will have an answer on the main question about math...

Re: nd-notation. How to count anything in tp?

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:50 pm
by janKipo
As usual, I don't find your particular cases very convincing, but the general idea would probably work and is actually not too untp.

Re: nd-notation. How to count anything in tp?

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:09 am
by janpona120
As usual, I don't find your particular cases very convincing
Naturally, because we have different points of view on the same thing. My approach is logical (digitalized).
the general idea would probably work and is actually not too untp.
This method ("word X") works at least 3.000 years. And now, even English uses this formula, for example, in phrasal verbs: "to get X" (where X is: at, on, off, and so far-far... away). Such a kind of frasal combinations are very match with tp-ideology ("nasin lawa"), because it gives tp a "suli" linguistic freedom, like a colorized butterfly can fly everywere on the linguistic floral field... and "ken li musi e ali"

Re: nd-notation. How to count anything in tp?

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:01 pm
by janKipo
Sorry, I don't do poetry.